W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > June 2006

RE: What's the point in using OWL-S?

From: Adrian Walker <adrianw@snet.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2006 11:50:08 -0400
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20060603114251.02b40a00@pop.snet.net>
To: "Gerhard Austaller" <gerhard.austaller@o2online.de>
Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org

Hi Gerhard  --

At 03:11 PM 6/3/2006 +0200, you wrote:
>I know that there is research on matching different ontologies and finding
>"somehow" corresponding concepts in the ontologies but I don't think that
>this will work in near future.


I'd be a bit more optimistic, but only if the correspondences between 
ontologies are set up at a higher semantic level, as in

   http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/OntologyInterop2.agent

   http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/MergeOntologies1.agent

   http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/SemanticResolution1.agent

   http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/EntertainmentTaxonomy1.agent

There's more about this in

    Understandability and Semantic Interoperability of Diverse Rules Systems
     www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/paper/19

   http://www.reengineeringllc.com/A_Wiki_for_Business_Rules_in_Open_Vocabulary_Executable_English.pdf

Hope this helps.  Thanks in advance for comments.


                                       -- Adrian



Internet Business Logic (R)
Executable open vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
Shared use is free

Adrian Walker
Reengineering
PO Box 1412
Bristol
CT 06011-1412 USA

Phone: USA 860 583 9677
Cell:    USA  860 830 2085
Fax:    USA  860 314 1029
Received on Saturday, 3 June 2006 15:50:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:32:54 UTC