- From: Gerhard Austaller <gerhard.austaller@o2online.de>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:30:25 +0200
- To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Hi I still have not understood what exactly an agent can achieve with the owl-s description of a service. Let's take the Bravo Air example. For an agent to book a ticket it has to "understand" the concepts used there. But where's the big advantage in having an interface (in WSDL) defined or an annotated WSDL like WSDL-S? I admit having the exact order of steps defined to achieve something is a step in the right direction... Now I want my agent also to book a ticket at another airline. So if this airline uses another ontology that ontology also as to be understandable to the agent made by an programmer. So do we assume that all airlines agree on one ontology and further also on the process how to do something? Do I miss something? Can please somebody explain or give me pointers what's a programmer can gain from an owl-s description? Thanks Gerhard
Received on Friday, 2 June 2006 16:30:47 UTC