- From: Margaret Lyell <mlyell@i-a-i.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 18:21:28 -0500
- To: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: <mlyell@i-a-i.com>
Hello, This question concerns the Process and Profile elements of the overall service description, and how elements of Process are intended to relate to elements of Profile. With regard to the service profile functionality description -- There are no classes for modeling IOPEs -- so an instance of Profile.owl must use the schema provided by Process.owl Of course, when describing a instance of Process.owl, there is support for Output, Result, etc. Typically, are the descriptions of IOPE elements in Process.owl for a particular service echoed in the Profile.owl ? (Do they match?) Or is the description given in (an instance of) Profile.owl -- which must use elements of the process schema -- generally regarded as being 'higher level' ? If so, then the IOPE elements in the Process and a Profile for a given service are not meant to be closely related. What was the intent? I am currently using OWL-S1.1 in a non-standard (ie, not a Web service) application (with Protégé editor), and I would greatly appreciate some input on the overall issue. Best regards, Margaret -- mlyell@i-a-i.com 1 301 294 5223
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 02:25:39 UTC