W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sws-ig@w3.org > September 2004

Re: Executing OWL-S/Profile

From: Luke Steller <luke.steller@infotech.monash.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:13:04 +1000
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Message-id: <415293A0.70606@infotech.monash.edu.au>

Actually, I am interested in the CMU tools, but cant find them anywhere 
for download. Both the CMU site, and  semwebcentral.org, have the OWL-S 
VM, and OWL-S API listed as current projects, but dont offer these for 
download yet. I assume they are not finished? But it sounds like some of 
you have tried them already??

Does anyone have these for download?

Thanks,

Luke Steller
School of Network Computing
Faculty of Information Technology
Monash University
Australia




Bijan Parsia wrote:

>
> On Sep 22, 2004, at 8:27 PM, Jun Shen wrote:
>
>> I supposed BPEL or ebXML may be good at execution of e-services while 
>> OWL-S enables matchmaking. :-)
>
>
> OWL-S process models are perfectly executable. As mentioned, our group 
> has a native OWL-S executer (in our OWL-S API), as does CMU (with 
> their DAML/OWL-S virtual machine). Neither of these compile to BPEL or 
> ebXML.
>
> Fujistu's Task Computing project uses the OWL-S API with our 
> reasonable Pellet to support user driven composition of OWL-S 
> described services and the execution of those compositions (i.e., 
> CompositeServices). We've published on our use of the SHOP2 planner to 
> automate composition of executable OWL-S compositions.
>
> Hmm. Now I notice the past tense of your "supposed". Does this mean 
> you no longer suppose that?
>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
>
>
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2004 09:13:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:32:46 UTC