- From: Olivier Dameron <dameron@smi.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:09:59 -0700
- To: Olivier Dameron <dameron@smi.stanford.edu>
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:59:19 -0700, Olivier Dameron <dameron@SMI.Stanford.EDU> wrote: > The last alternative seems to be the most complete, but requires to > maintain some similar taxonomical hierarchies for the service and the > profile (e.g. DepositService < BankingService; WithdrawalService < > BankingService; LoanService < BankingService; DepositProfile < > BankingProfile; WithdrawalProfile < BankingProfile; LoanProfile < > BankingProfile). > So, is the service taxonomy useful, or are service just meant to be > container for their profiles, their model and their groundings ? Or maybe that is what the profile:ServiceCategory is for ? Olivier
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2004 00:10:23 UTC