Re: Relation between OWL and OWL-S

• From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
• Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:07:28 +0900
• To: "Jun Shen" <jshen@it.swin.edu.au>
• Cc: <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <D3F6C2EC-3DAC-11D9-B962-000D93C1F7A6@isr.umd.edu>

On Nov 24, 2004, at 8:53 AM, Jun Shen wrote:

> Bijan,
>
> Hope CMU's CODE and your efforts in HTN planning in SHOP2 make OWL-S 
> more
> popular. Easy-to-deploy tools are so important.

No question.

I'll also point to SRI & the Protege groups effort to produce an OWL-S 
editor pluging for Protege, Evren's OWL-S API, and similar efforts.

Of course, CODE and the OWL-S editor are focused on *producing* 
descriptions. What *kind* of description will allow useful automation, 
even within the bound of what OWL-S encourages, is a different issue, 
alas.

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.

Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 00:07:35 UTC