- From: Austin Tate <a.tate@ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 08:54:56 +0100
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
At 16:59 04/05/2004 -0700, David Martin <martin@AI.SRI.COM> wrote:
>Regarding the other 2 properties ("timeout" and "timeoutAbsolute"), they
>have been properties of processes (actually of ProcessComponent, a
>superclass of Process) for a long time, but a point of this thread is that
>we are *removing* one of them. (So I think that is also in accord with
>your point of view. You should be celebrating. :-).
Yes, that was what I was supporting David. More precisely, if its needed,
I was suggesting it was better provided as a subclass of a more general
class of constraints on and between the various temporal intervals involved.
You know my view for the SWSL process model long term is that we only need:
* a set of activities (each assumed to be mapped to a time interval as now)
* a set of constraints (of various useful abstract kinds - e.g., temporal,
world state, resource, perhaps spatial and others is what we use).
* a set of annotations
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2004 03:53:22 UTC