- From: Gerhard Wickler <Gerhard.Wickler@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:32:01 +0200
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org
Bijan Parsia wrote: > On Jun 22, 2004, at 8:41 AM, Gerhard Wickler wrote: > >> >> Good point. I agree that having RDF/XML as the content language >> (using reification) looks like a good idea, especially because it >> answers my semantics question, > > > No, that it doesn't but it's tempting to thing it does is precisely > why it's a bad idea, IMHO. It would indeed be a bad idea if RDF/XML did not have a formal semantics, but it does, doesn't it? To be honest, I haven't looked at the semantics document in great detail, but it does seem to define a model-theortic semantics the way I'd expect it to. Anyway, we appear to agree that it is not a good idea to use RDF/XML with reification as a preconditions/effects language. Cheers, Gerhard
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2004 11:31:38 UTC