- From: Alexandre Lins <avrl@bol.com.br>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:10:26 -0200
- To: "public-sws-ig" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Hello,
can somebody help me with the problem below? I was not
aware of the new list so I guess I have missed some
discussion on DAML/OWL-S.
Regards,
Alexandre Lins.
---------- Início da mensagem original -----------
De: "Alexandre Lins" avrl@bol.com.br
Para: "www-ws" www-ws@w3.org
Cc:
Data: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:13:10 -0200
Assunto: Question on OWL-S 1.0 Profile
Hi,
I have a question about the new OWL-S 1.0 specification
and I thought perhaps someone in the list could help me
with this.
Looking through the specification for the profile I
noticed that the parameter descriptions (IOPEs) were
modified and became simple pointers to definitions in
the process model file.
This new arrangement is more compact and clear, but
from the point of view of service discovery and
matchmaking, does not it means that now I need to send
a profile and a process model to perform matching?
In the last version of the specification the names and
types of the parameters (IOPEs) were described in the
profile itself, and to perform matchmaking I could
simply send a profile description to a matchmaking
engine, right?
Now there is no such information on the profile
anymore, and so I would need to send both descriptions
(profile and process model) to the matchmaker. Either
this, or not sending any information regarding IOPEs
for the matchmaker, in which case the match would be
done based only on service parameters and categories,
and other information.
I just wanted to know if really got it right, or if I
missed something. Or perhaps there is some other
solution to this. Can someone help me with this?
Regards,
Alexandre Lins.
________________________________________________________
__________________
Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela.
AntiPop-up UOL - É grátis!
http://antipopup.uol.com.br/
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 09:16:04 UTC