- From: Alexandre Lins <avrl@bol.com.br>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:10:26 -0200
- To: "public-sws-ig" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
Hello, can somebody help me with the problem below? I was not aware of the new list so I guess I have missed some discussion on DAML/OWL-S. Regards, Alexandre Lins. ---------- Início da mensagem original ----------- De: "Alexandre Lins" avrl@bol.com.br Para: "www-ws" www-ws@w3.org Cc: Data: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:13:10 -0200 Assunto: Question on OWL-S 1.0 Profile Hi, I have a question about the new OWL-S 1.0 specification and I thought perhaps someone in the list could help me with this. Looking through the specification for the profile I noticed that the parameter descriptions (IOPEs) were modified and became simple pointers to definitions in the process model file. This new arrangement is more compact and clear, but from the point of view of service discovery and matchmaking, does not it means that now I need to send a profile and a process model to perform matching? In the last version of the specification the names and types of the parameters (IOPEs) were described in the profile itself, and to perform matchmaking I could simply send a profile description to a matchmaking engine, right? Now there is no such information on the profile anymore, and so I would need to send both descriptions (profile and process model) to the matchmaker. Either this, or not sending any information regarding IOPEs for the matchmaker, in which case the match would be done based only on service parameters and categories, and other information. I just wanted to know if really got it right, or if I missed something. Or perhaps there is some other solution to this. Can someone help me with this? Regards, Alexandre Lins. ________________________________________________________ __________________ Acabe com aquelas janelinhas que pulam na sua tela. AntiPop-up UOL - É grátis! http://antipopup.uol.com.br/
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2004 09:16:04 UTC