Re: strawman concise syntax (was Re: [OWL-S] new IOPE example #1)

> [Danny Ayers]
> But having looked again at the current syntax it is difficult to see how 
> the same things could be expressed in XML without losing most of the 
> legibility, ....

Could you point out some specific points where this would happen?  My
problem is that I'm not sure what aids or hampers legibility for XML
users.  

> I do think the Lispishness is likely to be offputting to 
> developers familiar with e.g. C# for code, SOAP+XML for data. 

Then we should adopt C# syntax for OWL-S.  It's easy to snicker at
people who are easily fooled by such superficial features of a
language, but in the real world the snickerers are not the ones
laughing all the way to the bank.

-- 
                                   -- Drew McDermott
                                      Yale Computer Science Department

Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 18:56:34 UTC