- From: Yuzhong Qu <yzqu@seu.edu.cn>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 11:16:34 +0800
- To: "Monika Solanki" <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
- Cc: "sws-ig" <public-sws-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <005901c3a66f$e19c8da0$fc0b77ca@xobjects>
Suggestion: In this case, the semantics should be deployed in the property itself, not in the range of the property. Yuzhong Qu ----- Original Message ----- From: Monika Solanki To: Huhns, Michael Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 12:10 AM Subject: Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 Hi Michael, The property that makes it special does not lie in the syntax but in the semantics. Precondition is a property which is required to be true, before the execution of the service. So there could be several formulae that could be classified as Conditions, however if any such formula is tagged with a qualifier that it is a precondition, it makes a difference in the interpretation of that Condition for the execution of the service. -Monika Huhns, Michael wrote: Hi Monika, If a Precondition is a special kind of Condition, then it must have some property (or a restriction on some property) that makes it special. What is this? That is, given a logical formula that evaluates to true or false, what property does it have that would enable you to determine whether it is a Condition or Precondition? Cheers, Mike Huhns -----Original Message----- From: public-sws-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sws-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Monika Solanki Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 5:15 AM To: David Martin Cc: public-sws-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: the precondition property in OWL-S 1.0 David Martin wrote: [Note: this thread is moving to public-sws-ig. After this message, replies should only be sent to public-sws-ig.] Marta Sabou wrote: Monika, Drew, I completely agree with the proposed solution. This should definitely be implemented in the next release. I also agree, except note that there are 2 proposals "on the table": I think Monika suggested this: Process - hasPrecondition - Precondition where Precondition is a subclass of Condition whereas Drew seems to be suggesting this: Process - hasPrecondition - Condition (with no Precondition class anywhere). I think we should retain the Precondition class and the hasPrecondition property. This is because, although Precondition is effectively a Condition, however it is a "special" kind of Condition. In the process model, Condition is a general thing, which is also used for Conditional Effects and Conditional Outputs. That reminds me - we still have an open issue about the class of an effect (that is, the range of ceEffect). Currently it's just "Thing", which isn't very satisfying. Do people feel that it's OK to have Condition for this range, or do we need something distinct? - David Cheers, Marta Drew McDermott wrote: [Monika Solanki, in re DAML-S spec] Currently in the 1.0 version of the process model, we have the following <owl:Class rdf:ID="Precondition" /> - <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="preCondition"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Precondition" /> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Condition" /> </owl:ObjectProperty> Where, Condition is defined as, - <owl:Class rdf:ID="Condition"> <rdfs:comment>This is a "place-holder" for now, which awaits further work from the DAML/OWL community. An instance of Condition is a logical formula that evaluates to true or false. Eventually we expect this to be defined elsewhere, as part of a OWL extension allowing for logical expressions.</rdfs:comment> </owl:Class> Somehow I am not able to grasp the utility of the property "preCondition". Since in this model, we have IOPEs as Classes, therefore I believe all we need to do is make Precondition a subclass of Condition. <owl:Class rdf:ID="PreCondition"> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Condition" /> </owl:Class> The property preCondition, introduces redundancy as it is ranging over the class "Condition" anyways. Feedback appreciated in case I missed something. You're right, as far as I can see. The important property is hasPrecondition, which connects a Condition to a Process or Process step. There is no reason for the class Precondition to exist, let alone a property preCondition linking a Precondition to a Condition (itself?). -- -- Drew McDermott Yale University CS Dept. -- **>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<** Monika Solanki Software Technology Research Laboratory(STRL) De Montfort University Hawthorn building, H00.18 The Gateway Leicester LE1 9BH, UK phone: +44 (0)116 250 6170 intern: 6170 email: monika@dmu.ac.uk web: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~monika **>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**
Received on Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:16:18 UTC