- From: Austin Tate <a.tate@ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 20:46:48 +0000
- To: public-sws-ig@w3.org
There is a new enactment requirements section in the document we are creating for the Language Committee. It tries to account for enactment related items raised in similar discussions in SWSA as posted by Mark Burstein. It also has inputs gleaned in discussions at the SWSI F-2-F in Captiva and the invited talk at ISWC-2003 by Mike Brodie, Chief Scientist of Verizon. http://www.daml.org/services/swsl/requirements/swsl-requirements.shtml I am the editor for this section, and I plan a revision of this by mid next week ahead of SWSL accepting this first version of the whole requirements document - which is to be voted on on November 20th. I at least plan to make a more coherent list of enactment requirements with less repeated items. I could use inputs and thoughts about the current draft to make this input more of a shared view. Let me have them by early next week if you can folks. Austin
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:47:59 UTC