[to do] searching for advice - simplest semantic web editor

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 15:39:55 +0530
Subject: [to do] searching for advice - simplest semantic web editor
To: Ivan VAGANOV <ivan_vaganov@mail.ru>

Ivan
Here other pointers
It would be useful if this group could maintain an up to date list
with some reviews/user experiences

http://notes.3kbo.com/visual
http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/13760/web-based-rdf-graph-visualization-tool

On 9/8/14, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ivan
> welcome to the list
>
>> I am searching for a simple tool with graphic interface which would allow
>> me
>> to structure and visualize knowledge for my master thesis. I am willing
>> to
>> link a few blocks with simplest RDF links, so I will be able to present
>> pictures/graphs and allow the examinators to browse through by their own.
>> I
>> would like to use the approach of semantic web and not to describe the
>> issues in plain text. I am writing about information extraction and text
>> mining.
>>
>
> OK    I am sure there are lots of ways to do this....
>
> showing the diagram is a good start-
>
> personally I like to ask 'why'
> (if you dont want to answer, thats okay)
>
> I ask why you want to take a semantic web approach, because often
> people dont understand the actual benefits, which is a pity
>
> to visualize related concepts, I have used mindmapping tools, there
> are lots, and lots of ways to use them, they do not require RDF (just
> parse the text, a mindmap will be created and it can be tweaked).  so
> my first question is whether your concept map can be mapped
> successfully without RDF, then you should do so (imho)
>
> In my understanding , the benefit of using RDF is that it allows
> search of unstructured content across various (web) repositories which
> are not integrated/harmonized.normalized
>
> simply  showing off RDF visualizations without understanding the
> reason why this is done, is not good practice in my personal
> professional opinion
>
> (seen scores of pointless RDF done by students in top universities
> just for showing)
>
> Therefore, as I always say, make sure you get your data model clearly
> uprfront, and design it so that the benefit of RDF can be demonstrated
> intelligently :-)
>
> does what I say make sense?
> (if anyone disagrees with this, please do so )
>
> Dont have a complete list at hand  - two resources below come up with
> pointers to visual editors , and surely more advice will come from our
> members here-
>
> When you get the chance to test any of these, please let us know what you
> think
> and if you compile a list please also share
> PDM
>
> Dave Beckett's RDF Resource Guide - Planet RDF
> planetrdf.com/guide/
>
> Free visual RDF/SPARQL editors
> http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/12039/free-visual-rdfsparql-editors-for-classroom-teaching
> r .
>>
>>
>> FEW MORE DETAILS:
>>
>> After reviewing literature, I have a big table. In fact, it has a few
>> types
>> of elements:
>>
>> .       Source
>>
>> .       Name of a program,
>>
>> .       Type of Interface,
>>
>> .       Purpose
>>
>> .       Details.
>>
>>
>>
>> All that information is interlinked - one source talks about few
>> programs,
>> different programs have same type of interface, different programs have
>> same
>> purpose, or one program have a few purposes.
>>
>> I would like to connect these blocks and visualize it, to have something
>> as
>> on attached picture. In the best case, each block should have a link to
>> an
>> excel file (or URL) with all the details.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please, have a look at the picture!
>>
>> I would be thankful for your comments!
>>
>> Have a wonderful weekend!
>>
>>
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Это сообщение свободно от вирусов и вредоносного ПО благодаря защите от
>> вирусов avast!
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2014 10:10:53 UTC