- From: Martin Voigt <martin.voigt@tu-dresden.de>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 09:37:49 +0200
- To: public-swisig@w3.org
Hi all, I agree to Paola and Roberto as well! Martin Am 22.04.2014 09:20, schrieb Roberto García González: > Like Paola, I don't see the group mature enough to transition to a WG. > As a WG we need to deliver something and before that we should agree > what we want to deliver and who is going to contribute. > > Roberto García > Associate Professor > Universitat de Lleida > Jaume II, 69 > 25001 Lleida, Spain > Tel. +34 973 702 742 > http://rhizomik.net/~roberto > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com > <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Milton > the reason why I am hesitant to consider the transition now, is > because although we have managed to rustle up a good portfolio of > related activites from individual members, there has been no joint > activity nor discussions > > A WG needs to commit to deliver or it fails > > Imho, if at least 5 people make some commitment to deliver work, the > group can make transition otherwise better stay informal > > Have revised the form to include statement of commitment from members, > *http://tinyurl.com/mnr3fqe* > > if something crops up, we ll resubmit the form > > Found these guidelines for WG, hope they still hold > http://www.w3.org/2003/06/Process-20030618/groups.html > > Thanks > > PDM > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:07 PM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program > <metadataportals@yahoo.com <mailto:metadataportals@yahoo.com>> wrote: > > Correct me if I am wrong. There are three categories of issues > to consider when transitioning from Community group to Work Group. > > (1) Mission, objectives and program outline, including projects > and tasks (2) Governance and procedures (3) Contributions made > by members > > The problem lies in (1) and (3), of which (1) is the most > critical. If we cannot resolve (1) before May 5 next we must not > transition. > > The form seems fine to me. > > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 <tel:%2B297%20747%208280> > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools > for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide by > creating ICT tools for NGOs worldwide and: providing online > access to web sites and repositories of data and information for > sustainable development > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential > and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to > whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in > error please notify the system manager. This message contains > confidential information and is intended only for the individual > named. If you are not the named addressee you should not > disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. > On Monday, April 21, 2014 7:18 AM, Paola Di Maio > <paola.dimaio@gmail.com <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>> wrote: > Sure Milton- > > Do I gather that you think we are ready? > > is there something we should expect to happen before May 1st? > > I just checked the dashboard for a polling facility > but could not find it > > is this form OK? > *http://tinyurl.com/mnr3fqe* > > PDM > > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:16 PM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program > <metadataportals@yahoo.com <mailto:metadataportals@yahoo.com>> > wrote: > > Can we take unitl like May 1, 2014 to try to finalize a > transition? If by May 1 next we do not all feel comfortable > about this we can do a poll and take a consensus based decision. > > regards > > Milton Ponson > GSM: +297 747 8280 > PO Box 1154, Oranjestad > Aruba, Dutch Caribbean > Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the > tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders > worldwide by creating ICT tools for NGOs worldwide and: > providing online access to web sites and repositories of > data and information for sustainable development > > This email and any files transmitted with it are > confidential and intended solely for the use of the > individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have > received this email in error please notify the system > manager. This message contains confidential information and > is intended only for the individual named. If you are not > the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute > or copy this e-mail. > On Sunday, April 20, 2014 3:02 AM, Paola Di Maio > <paola.dimaio@gmail.com <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>> wrote: > Greetings SWISIG members > > Yesterday I filled out a form to W3C more or less saying we > are not > ready yet to transition to WG, (I reply quickly sometimes > not to forget) > > Only after hitting the send button > it occurred to me I should have consulted with co-chair and > group members > > We can change our response til 10 May, so if enough ppl think > we should transition this year, please stepfforward and > state your commitment to make things happen, and we'll resubmit > > Otherwise, let's see if plans mature in their own time > > Thanks, happy Spring Holidays to all > > PDM > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *Paola Di Maio via WBS Mailer* <webmaster@w3.org > <mailto:webmaster@w3.org>> > Date: Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 7:45 AM > Subject: [wbs] response to 'Determining which Community and > Business Groups transitions to Working Group' > To: paola.dimaio@gmail.com <mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com>, > team-community-process@w3.org > <mailto:team-community-process@w3.org> > > > The following answers have been successfully submitted to > 'Determining which > Community and Business Groups transitions to Working Group' > (public) for > Paola Di Maio. > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Your Community Group or Business Group > > ---- > > Please, name the Community Group or Business Group for > which you are > > submitting answers. > > > > > Name of your Community Group or Business Group: SEMANTIC WEB > INTERFACES > (SWI) SIG > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > State of your Community Group or Business Group > > ---- > > Is your Community Group or Business Group: > > > > > > * ( ) Active and ongoing and nearing completion > * ( ) Inactive because it has completed its work > * (x) Active and ongoing and far from completion > * ( ) Inactive because the original scope is no longer > relevant or because > the CG never got momentum > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Goal of your Community Group or Business Group > > ---- > > Is the goal of your Community Group or Business Group: > > > > > > * (x) To provide a specification > * ( ) To be a discussion forum for specifications done > elsewhere > * ( ) Other (please specify) > You checked "other", please specify: > a high level specificationn > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Status of the spec of your Community Group or Business Group > > ---- > > What are your specification transition plans? > > > > * ( ) We have already handed off all or part of a > specification to a > Working Group. > > * ( ) We plan to request that a specification transition > to a Working > Group within six months. > > * ( ) We have a specification that is a candidate for > transition to a > Working Group but have no schedule yet for doing so. > * (x) We do not plan to transition a specification to a > Working Group > (provide details in the next question). > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > No transition to a Working Group > > ---- > > We do not expect to transition to a Working Group for the > following > > reasons (check all that apply): > > > > > > * [x] Too early, insufficient number of implementations yet. > * [ ] Too narrow, not a key part of the Open Web Platform. > * [ ] A Community Group or Business Group is good enough, > Working Groups > have too much bureaucracy. > * [ ] We suspect that key players will not want to make > Working Group > patent commitments. > * [ ] Too many key players are not Members of W3C and > would not want to > follow the work into a Working Group. > * [ ] Other (please specify). > You checked "other", please specify: > exploratory work, community is still loosely engaged so far > maybe if one or two ears if things mature > > > > > > > --------------------------------- > > Open comments > > ---- > > Please, let us us know of anything you feel is relevant > to complete your > > answers. > > > > > Comments: > > > > > > These answers were last modified on 19 April 2014 at > 02:14:48 U.T.C. > > by Paola Di Maio > > > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed until > 2014-05-11. > > Regards, > > The Automatic WBS Mailer > > > > > > > > > -- ----------------------------------- Dipl.-Medieninf. Martin Voigt PhD student Technische Universität Dresden Faculty of Computer Science Institute of Software and Multimedia Technology 01062 Dresden fax : +49 (351) 463-38518 web: http://mmt.inf.tu-dresden.de/voigt email: martin.voigt@tu-dresden.de skype: m.voigt.1982 linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/martin-voigt/9/3a0/64b twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/m_a_r_t_i_n
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 07:38:15 UTC