- From: Cristiano Longo <cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:37:36 +0100
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <908ce4f1-e716-44e4-a82d-88391e73ffcf@opendatahacklab.org>
Thank you very much, I fond this that is really specific https://nlnet.nl/opensocial/ However just 50K euro will be funded, so that just one or two person would be involved. Now I have to understand if, in the case I got this grant, how I should interact with the official Activity Pub charter. However, on monday I'll have a meeting at my university to discuss about this grant and other opportunities. CL On 18/03/25 09:53, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > út 18. 3. 2025 v 9:27 odesílatel Cristiano Longo > <cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org> napsal: > > I'm going to look for any funding for this. Any suggestion about > an appropriate funding source and scheme will be appreciated. > Also, proposals for collaborations with other institutions are > welcome. > > > I would recommend NLNet, they are very generous with funding: > > https://nlnet.nl/propose/ > > CL > > On 04/10/24 10:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> >> >> pá 4. 10. 2024 v 10:03 odesílatel Cristiano Longo >> <cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org> napsal: >> >> The OWL file have to be mantained and enriched, as reported in >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swicg/2023Dec/0014.html >> >> I don't know if it is appropriate that the community group >> work on this. >> And, if so, I'm not sure if this should be mentioned in the >> document >> under discussion or it could emerge later as a work item. >> >> I'm sorry but I cannot attend the today meeting. >> >> It’s the machine-readable vocabulary for ActivityPub. Could we >> perhaps just call it the *Schema*, *Vocab*, or *Ontology* for >> ActivityPub, instead of "OWL"? OWL stands for Ontology Web >> Language, and that’s a bit less intuitive for most folks. >> >> In the linked data world, a schema is essential, and it should be >> referenced in the context. The context itself isn’t meant for >> definitions—it’s more of an intermediary between the specific >> JSON format (or "profile") and the schema. >> >> There was quite a bit of work done on the schema during the >> Working Group, but at some point, the link to it seems to have >> been broken—intentionally or not. I think it would be a valuable >> task to restore that connection and make the ActivityPub schema >> fully compliant with W3C standards again. >> >> >> CL >> >> On 08/12/23 17:38, Evan Prodromou wrote: >> > The original development file for AS2 was an OWL file. >> > >> > I don't think it was ever edited after James Snell created >> the first >> > JSON-LD context file. >> > >> > But it's been in the Activity Streams 2.0 repository on >> GitHub since >> > it was created. >> > >> > We get occasional requests to make changes to it to bring >> it into line >> > with the JSON-LD context doc. Some LinkedData developers >> seem to >> > prefer using it. >> > >> > We had a new issue filed this week about it, and on the >> issue triage >> > call we came up with a novel solution: move the file to its >> own >> > repository in the SWICG namespace, and let people who are >> interested >> > in using and maintaining it work on the project. >> > >> > The new repository is here: >> > >> > https://github.com/swicg/activitystreams2-owl >> > >> > Big appreciation to Emelia Smith for getting the process >> rolling. >> > We've already had one PR applied. >> > >> > I had removed the file from the w3c/activitystreams repo, >> but Ben >> > Goering pointed out that it probably needed more consensus >> and a >> > discussion here. >> > >> > So, let's discuss! >> > >> > I'd love to see this unofficial file maintained and >> updated. I think >> > moving it to a repo where people in the LD community can >> maintain it >> > is a great solution. >> > >> > Evan >> > >> > >>
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2025 18:37:48 UTC