Re: The OWL file

út 18. 3. 2025 v 9:27 odesílatel Cristiano Longo <
cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org> napsal:

> I'm going to look for any funding for this. Any suggestion about an
> appropriate funding source and scheme will be appreciated. Also, proposals
> for collaborations with other institutions are welcome.
>

I would recommend NLNet, they are very generous with funding:

https://nlnet.nl/propose/


> CL
> On 04/10/24 10:11, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
>
> pá 4. 10. 2024 v 10:03 odesílatel Cristiano Longo <
> cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org> napsal:
>
>> The OWL file have to be mantained and enriched, as reported in
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swicg/2023Dec/0014.html
>>
>> I don't know if it is appropriate that the community group work on this.
>> And, if so, I'm not sure if this should be mentioned in the document
>> under discussion or it could emerge later as a work item.
>>
>> I'm sorry but I cannot attend the today meeting.
>>
>
>
> It’s the machine-readable vocabulary for ActivityPub. Could we perhaps
> just call it the *Schema*, *Vocab*, or *Ontology* for ActivityPub,
> instead of "OWL"? OWL stands for Ontology Web Language, and that’s a bit
> less intuitive for most folks.
>
> In the linked data world, a schema is essential, and it should be
> referenced in the context. The context itself isn’t meant for
> definitions—it’s more of an intermediary between the specific JSON format
> (or "profile") and the schema.
>
> There was quite a bit of work done on the schema during the Working Group,
> but at some point, the link to it seems to have been broken—intentionally
> or not. I think it would be a valuable task to restore that connection and
> make the ActivityPub schema fully compliant with W3C standards again.
>
>>
>> CL
>>
>> On 08/12/23 17:38, Evan Prodromou wrote:
>> > The original development file for AS2 was an OWL file.
>> >
>> > I don't think it was ever edited after James Snell created the first
>> > JSON-LD context file.
>> >
>> > But it's been in the Activity Streams 2.0 repository on GitHub since
>> > it was created.
>> >
>> > We get occasional requests to make changes to it to bring it into line
>> > with the JSON-LD context doc. Some LinkedData developers seem to
>> > prefer using it.
>> >
>> > We had a new issue filed this week about it, and on the issue triage
>> > call we came up with a novel solution: move the file to its own
>> > repository in the SWICG namespace, and let people who are interested
>> > in using and maintaining it work on the project.
>> >
>> > The new repository is here:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/swicg/activitystreams2-owl
>> >
>> > Big appreciation to Emelia Smith for getting the process rolling.
>> > We've already had one PR applied.
>> >
>> > I had removed the file from the w3c/activitystreams repo, but Ben
>> > Goering pointed out that it probably needed more consensus and a
>> > discussion here.
>> >
>> > So, let's discuss!
>> >
>> > I'd love to see this unofficial file maintained and updated. I think
>> > moving it to a repo where people in the LD community can maintain it
>> > is a great solution.
>> >
>> > Evan
>> >
>> >
>>
>>