- From: Cristiano Longo <cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:52:30 +0100
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 17 January 2025 15:52:36 UTC
On 17/01/25 15:35, a wrote: > > Can we assume, as it would be natural, that every Accept instance > must have exactly one actor and exactly one object? > > No, as these properties are not defined as “functional” (having at > most exactly one value). This does not preclude that such properties may be functional on some domain restrictions. > > In English, “the” does not always represent a singular instance of > something, but rather sometimes the general class of that thing. For > example, a wildlife documentary might refer to “the majestic lion” > without necessarily talking about one specific lion. > > In the descriptions given in the vocabulary, the use of “the” does not > (and should not be taken as to) imply that a property is restricted to > one value. Ok, thank you very much
Received on Friday, 17 January 2025 15:52:36 UTC