- From: Marcus Rohrmoser <me.swicg@mro.name>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 10:43:05 +0200
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 12:22:16 -0700 Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote: > I think would be great for SWICG to run a forum for developers about ActivityPub. Maybe we could even use the w3c.social domain...? Yes, great! But maybe not limited to developers. > Or swicg.io? please no new (tld) domains. ActivityPub.Rocks is referred to in https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/#:~:text=activitypub.rocks, so those URLs should at least redirect to sensible URLs anyway. I assume the long term sustainability to have "cool uris" in a spec was considered when writing the standard back then. Anyway, it should be now. So, - who funds the domain cost - who controls the redirects - where should they point Which leads back to "who stewards the forum and on what funding". Ideally a small institutional body or a few individuals (3?). And - what expectations should the forum address. Can it be aligned with the activitypub website targeting the broader public, which IMO is in the making, is it? (That's happening on a non-federated, for-profit, corporate AI harvester website. I avoid such.) Marcus
Received on Saturday, 2 August 2025 08:43:12 UTC