- From: Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 00:51:53 +0000
- To: Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name>
- Cc: Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>, "public-swicg@w3.org" <public-swicg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKXmGHBZbFrtyQz-Z_xbxd331Eu9F4zN0WW+6SKF3+2R7rMcnw@mail.gmail.com>
One question. Can I make issues and possibly pull requests against it ? Aaron Gray - @AaronNGray@fosstodon.org Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher, Information Theorist, and Computer Scientist. On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 21:03, Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> wrote: > There are some flags we can set to get it to say it's from the CG. I will > talk to Philippe about it. > > > Evan > > > On February 7, 2024 1:53:13 p.m. EST, Dmitri Zagidulin < > dzagidulin@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Understood, yeah. And my suggestion is - we do have a pressing need. When >> a developer sees the E.D. is served from the w3c/activitypub repo, that >> implies that it's still stewarded by the WG, which is not the case. >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:37 PM Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> >> wrote: >> >>> It's actually linked from the published recommendation: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/ >>> >>> So I think we should keep it where it is, unless there's a pressing need. >>> >>> Evan >>> On 2024-02-06 4:25 p.m., Dmitri Zagidulin wrote: >>> >>> Evan, >>> Thanks again for kicking this off, I'm incredibly excited about AP >>> getting an ongoing Editors Draft. >>> >>> One change that I'd like to propose, though -- can we move the AP >>> Editor's Draft to the SWICG github org? >>> We don't want incoming developers to be confused that the >>> SWICG-stewarded changes represent the old WG's work. >>> Meaning, we can add a link to the top of the TR that says something like >>> work is continuing at the SWICG, here's link to editor's draft, etc. >>> It'll also help with the governance of the E.D., since most of us in the >>> group don't have access to the WG's repo. >>> >>> Dmitri >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:48 PM Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> There is a new ActivityPub editor's draft available here: >>>> >>>> https://w3c.github.io/activitypub/ >>>> >>>> It's based on incorporating errata that have accumulated over the past >>>> few years. It has no other changes. Changelog here: >>>> >>>> https://w3c.github.io/activitypub/#changelog >>>> >>>> There are issues with the introductory data, and ReSpec is grumpy about >>>> some of the metadata elements. I'm going to see what I can do to >>>> improve >>>> them. >>>> >>>> Thanks to everyone who helped make this draft better. >>>> >>>> Evan >>>> >>>> >>>>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2024 00:52:11 UTC