Re: HTTP Signature CG report

Oops, apologies, that last link should be
https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-http-signature/issues .

On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 11:34 AM Ryan Barrett <public@ryanb.org> wrote:

> Hot on the heels of Evan's and a's announcement of the Webfinger CG report
> last week, I'm pleased to say that nightpool and I will be editing a
> similar CG report on HTTP Signatures in the fediverse.
>
> I have one ask for the group: do any of you know of a good example or two
> of a successful W3C CG report? I'm still ramping up on exactly what these
> are and how they fit into the broader standards ecosystem. Good past
> examples would be welcome!
>
> Right now, as with the webfinger report, the goal here is to collect
> information on current use of HTTP Sigs with AP, give directions for
> implementers to get started with best practices, and point towards future
> work that can be done.
>
> Repository: https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-http-signature
> Skeleton report template:
> https://swicg.github.io/activitypub-http-signature/
>
> We've started collecting candidate requirements in
> https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-webfinger/issues . Feel free to
> comment or add your own proposals!
>
> --
> https://snarfed.org/
>


-- 
https://snarfed.org/