Re: More detailed OWL2 definitions of Activity Vocabulary

On 05/02/24 14:25, Emelia Smith wrote:
> Just a small note: I believe the spec team is looking for a maintainer 
> for the Owl files in both w3c/activitypub and w3c/activitysteam 
> repositories on GitHub.
>
> Evan can probably give more details.
>
> — Emelia
Good news, I hope they find one in short!
>
>> On 5. Feb 2024, at 12:10, Cristiano Longo 
>> <cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>> On 04/02/24 23:14, Johannes Ernst wrote:
>>>> On Feb 4, 2024, at 12:53, Cristiano Longo 
>>>> <cristianolongo@opendatahacklab.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Activity Vocabulary specification is provided as a text 
>>>> document written in natural language. But, aside this, the 
>>>> vocabulary is also described in a non-normative OWL ontology. I 
>>>> published a new ontology where the constrains provided in the text 
>>>> document are encoded as OWL2 constraints. Right now I focused on 
>>>> class descriptions, but I plan to consider also all others 
>>>> vocabulary definitions.
>>>>
>>>> The ontology is available at 
>>>> http://www.opendatahacklab.org/ns/as2extdefs
>>>
>>> For curiosity, how are you expecting this to be used?
>>>
>> I can say how I intend to use it. I'm doing this job in order to get 
>> a deeper understanding of the ActivityPub specification, as it is 
>> confusing me. I planned to realize a test cases generator, in 
>> particular to get the "expected" intended audience. But, the first 
>> step to this is to provide a full specification in a formal framework 
>> (such as OWL2) of AS2.
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Johannes.
>>>
>>>
>>> Johannes Ernst
>>>
>>> Fediforum <https://fediforum.org/>
>>> Dazzle Labs <https://dazzlelabs.net/>
>>>

Received on Monday, 5 February 2024 14:04:23 UTC