Re: Proposed agenda items for 5 Apr 2024 meeting

Hmm. I'm guessing you mean a's ActivityPub and Webfinger report
<https://swicg.github.io/activitypub-webfinger/>?

On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 12:05 AM Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ryan,
>
> I have used your specification for my Bash based webfinger
>
> a) to deal with the Mastodon username validation - which should be okay
> b) the RFC3077 username validation - which has issues, no RegEx, and the
> ABNF was not clear to me, the 0*(...) was not obvious
>
> Here's my repo if you want to play :-
>
> https://github.com/AaronNGray/webfinger.sh
>
> It should all be self installing all within the one
> webfinger command, which can be copied locally.
>
> I hope to expand this work to be a complete ActivityPub/Streams set of
> tools and maybe even a test set.
>
> If people are interested I may do a quick demo at the end of
> todays session.
>
> Regards,
>
> Aaron
>
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 04:44, Aaron Gray <aaronngray@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have a number of issues. I will file them for completeness but would
>> like to discuss them tomorrow.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Aaron
>>
>> Aaron Gray - @AaronNGray@fosstodon.org
>>
>> Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher,
>> Information Theorist, and Computer Scientist.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 at 00:53, Ryan Barrett <public@ryanb.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all! Late notice, but I'm hoping to take a minute on tomorrow's call
>>> to announce the first draft of the ActivityPub and HTTP Signatures
>>> report <https://swicg.github.io/activitypub-http-signature/> and
>>> request review and feedback. I'm happy to hear comments on the call, if we
>>> have time, or you're welcome to file them in a GitHub issue
>>> <https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-http-signature/issues>.
>>>
>>> See you all tomorrow!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 10:47 AM Evan Prodromou <evan@prodromou.name>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For the chairs and everyone else: I have three proposed agenda items
>>>> for the 5 Apr 2024 meeting.
>>>>
>>>>    1. *Advance ActivityPub-Webfinger profile to a draft report*. a has
>>>>    done a great draft here, and there's been a lot of issue development and
>>>>    guidance. If a thinks it's ready, I believe we should release this report
>>>>    as a CG-DRAFT for wider review.
>>>>    2. *Integrate the Security namespace into the Activity Streams 2.0
>>>>    context document*. Web Security 1.0 is a widely-implemented context
>>>>    used for HTTP Signature properties in ActivityPub. It would make a good
>>>>    test case for the extensions process
>>>>    <https://swicg.github.io/extensions-policy/>.
>>>>    3. *Consider an OAuth 2.0 profile for ActivityPub*. One discussion
>>>>    that has come up during issue triage is aligning the different OAuth 2.0
>>>>    profiles for AP. FEP-d8c2
>>>>    <https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/d8c2/fep-d8c2.md>
>>>>    lays one out; there are also suggestions to use OIDC's discovery
>>>>    mechanisms. Because we already have several profiles for using other
>>>>    standards with AP, and because OAuth 2.0 is the primary way for client
>>>>    applications to access API servers, I think it may be good for developers
>>>>    to have a report on current best practices for OAuth 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> Evan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> https://snarfed.org/
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Aaron Gray - @AaronNGray@fosstodon.org
>
> Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher,
> Information Theorist, and Computer Scientist.
>
>

-- 
https://snarfed.org/