Thank you, Ian! I think the "Social Web Incubator Community Group" name aptly summarizes what we do. We discuss and incubate new and existing social web technologies, especially those pertaining to existing W3C social web specifications. I have been using SocialCG as a shorthand and it is documented on the W3C wiki (https://www.w3.org/wiki/SocialCG). perhaps it would be helpful to ensure the description on w3.org contains a clearer description. I am happy to make this amendment. I would love to hear from more community members on this topic. Thanks, James ------- Original Message ------- On Saturday, September 23rd, 2023 at 03:19, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > It’s easy to make some changes (e.g., the group name, or updates to the description on the CG home page). It’s less easy to make other changes (e.g., the mailing list names). > > Let us know if you’d like any changes, > > Ian > > > > On Sep 22, 2023, at 8:02 PM, Johannes Ernst johannes.ernst@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > On Sep 22, 2023, at 16:44, nightpool eg1290@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > > The SWICG officially rebranded itself to the SocialCG many years ago, I don't think anybody remembered to tell W3C staff to update the web page. > > > > Duh. > > > > As ActivityPub is gaining much broader attention these days, I’d suggest that we pay attention to those details. > > > > Each “Why is X?” Increases the equivalent of the “drop-off rate” of a potential adopter by 20%. Or some number like that. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Johannes. > > > > Johannes Ernst > > > > Fediforum > > Dazzle > > > -- > Ian Jacobs ij@w3.org > > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ > Tel: +1 917 450 8783 > > > >
Received on Monday, 25 September 2023 19:46:12 UTC