Re: AS2/AP tasks for a chartered social web working group

On 20/09/2023 09:55, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> I mention it because, depending on who you speak to, Nostr is already 
> part of the functioning fediverse.
On 19/09/2023 09:38, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> Highly controversial items put a charter at risk, so we should avoid 
> that.  Let's stick to ActivityPub, ActivityStreams and fediverse in 
> general.
So let me get this straight, Nostr *is* the Fediverse because it's been 
bridged, and Mitra 
<https://codeberg.org/silverpill/mitra/src/branch/main/src/activitypub/identifiers.rs#L18> 
(which loyally implements the AP spec) *isn't* because you don't like 
the authentication choices it made?

I would remind the rest of the list that many implementers are not even 
subscribed to this list or attending our calls. We will not bring them 
back into the conversation by moving the goalposts on what qualifies as 
an implementation, or by gatekeeping their implementation choices with a 
Working Group charter that excludes their work to date.