Re: aaron + social web?

Thanks, TIL! I just joined the channel 👍

Off topic, I've also seen some people talking about merging Matrix into 
the fediverse for the E2E DM feature. Might be worth discussing.

On 23/05/2023 10:46, aschrijver wrote:
>  > When talking adding a Matrix chat channel I might point to effort on 
SocialHub to bring more cohesion between otherwise independent 
initiatives, to avoid overlap and reinventing wheels: > > 
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/ideating-organization-structure-for-the-grassroots-fediverse-wiki/3037/2 
<https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/ideating-organization-structure-for-the-grassroots-fediverse-wiki/3037/2> 
 > > There is currently a Fediverse Developers channel, where many 
people that are active both at the SocialHub and the SWICG mailing list 
are already present: > > 
https://matrix.to/#/#fediverse-developer-network:matrix.org 
<https://matrix.to/#/#fediverse-developer-network:matrix.org> > > 
SocialHub community forum has an official liaison to the SWICG.. this 
matrix chat channel might be similarly associated. The initiative it was 
launched for can be found on https://fedidevs.org <https://fedidevs.org> 
 > > Note: In other SWICG mail thread there's discussion about impact of 
the Meta entry to the Fediverse. Any cohesion we might forge in our 
grassroots movement would make our position stronger in the face of such 
big corporate entries. > ------- Original Message ------- > On Tuesday, 
May 23rd, 2023 at 10:28, Kagami Rosylight <saschanaz@outlook.com> wrote: 
 > >> Can we get Matrix as the common channel as WHATWG does? 🤔 >> >> 
 >> On May 23, 2023 8:06:32 AM GMT+02:00, Melvin Carvalho 
<melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> út 23. 5. 2023 v 3:05 
odesílatel Jacky Alcine <yo@jacky.wtf> napsal: >>
> What was the point of asking this in a public mailing list (outside of
> a bit of attention seeking) outside of just using his contact page[1]
> about their engagement?
>
>
> >>     I'd like to gently push back on this phrase "outside of a bit 
> of attention seeking" as it could be thought of as a passive 
> aggressive jab, and I think such phrases should be avoided.
>
> >>     During the working group stage, the IndieWeb members chose 
> alternative communication channels over the mailing list, which was 
> indeed productive for that group. However, this resulted in a 
> communication gap for those who primarily used the mailing list.
>
> >>     Now, with the Community Group using the mailing list as the 
> main communication method, it's possible that Aaron, as our chair, 
> might not receive all messages. Since I'm no longer as active in 
> IndieWeb's IRC, but some still are, I thought it would be relevant to 
> check in with Aaron on his preference for staying connected given the 
> recent activity in the group.
>
> >>     I hope this provides a clearer understanding of the original 
> message.
>
>
> I'm also a IndieWeb user[2] and I engage with this list. What are your
> intentions?
>
> [1]: https://aaronparecki.com/contact/ <https://aaronparecki.com/contact/>
> [2]: https://indieweb.org/User:Jacky.wtf 
> <https://indieweb.org/User:Jacky.wtf>
>
> On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 00:44 +0200, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
> > Aaron is currently chair of the SWICG
> > I was wondering how active he still is?
> > His feed shows he's still quite up to date and writing current SW
> > matters:
> > https://aaronparecki.com/articles <https://aaronparecki.com/articles>
> > It's quite typical of indieweb users not to use mailing lists, so it
> > might be nice if someone that knows him, asked him what his plans
> > are in general.
>
>
>>  >> >