Re: First 2023 SWICG meeting call on Fri May 19

Might be worth familiarizing yourself with the Social Web Working Group Use
Cases

A lot of time went into this (it was also very political)

8 of the 91 use cases were approved, leaving up to 83 left as future work

Some of these could be potential CG work items.  The one I think is
personally pivotal, and where facebook has the competitive advantage, is
the friendship graph.  This page covers all:

https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Browsing_the_Friendship_Graph

st 17. 5. 2023 v 18:56 odesílatel Dmitri Zagidulin <dzagidulin@gmail.com>
napsal:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Finding a regular meeting time slot that works with everyone continues to
> be an impossible task.
>
> In the interest of getting momentum going, we'll be having our first
> SWICG call of the year this coming Friday, May 19, at 9 am EST / 6 am
> Pacific / 3 pm CET over at:
>
> https://meet.jit.si/social-web-cg
>
> Apologies in advance to those who can't make it, let's continue the
> discussion on what we can do to accommodate more people (perhaps alternate
> biweekly calls, one on Fri and one on Saturday, etc).
>
> AGENDA:
>
> 1) (NON-AGENDA item) Although the common first call agenda tradition is
> introductions, I'm wondering if we can shortcut the introduction process by
> doing it elsewhere, such as on the SWICG mailing list, or SocialHub forum.
> Otherwise there's a good chance that we'll take up the whole call with
> intros. :)
>
> 2) Overview of the W3C Community Group process (code of conduct,
> governance, etc) to refresh our memories.
>
> 3) Discussion and proposals for:
>
> * What are the goals and current focus of SWICG
>
> * What is SWICG's relationship with the other centers of community and
> discussion, such as SocialHub https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/,
> Fediverse Enhancement Proposals (FEP) https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep,
> the Fedidevs Matrix chat rooms. (My view on this: We can all work together
> with those communities, without co-opting or interference.)
>
> * Governance process for adopting Work Items. (For a good example of an
> existing effective Work Item Process, see the Credential Community Group's
> process doc: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/workitem-process/ )
>
> 4) Other discussion as time allows.
>
> Thank you, talk to you soon.
>
> Dmitri
>