Re: Is there anyone here from major ActivityPub implementations? (Mastodon, Pleroma, etc?)

I run the Hometown fork of Mastodon, which I'm not sure counts as "major"
but there are ~8500 active users across ~130 servers according to
https://hometown.fediverse.observer

Hometown does play with federation a bit, reading more ActivityPub object
types than Mastodon does, and tweaking the Mastodon Note objects.

I am especially open to federating with new Events and Objects and happy to
discuss experimental federation in a production context with real users.

-Darius

On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 7:41 AM Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us> wrote:

> In looking over the list of particpants, I couldn't find any indication
> that the current major users of previous W3C social standards, such as
> ActivityPub, are represented in this group. It may be that I simply don't
> recognize all the names on the list. But, it seems to me that if the
> incumbent implementors of the W3C Social Web standards aren't here, then an
> effort should be made to recruit them. It will be difficult to discuss
> making changes or extensions without input from those who currently depend
> on these standards.
>
> If you are representing, in some form or another, an existing
> implementation of ActivityPub, etc. I'd appreciate it if you indicated that.
>
> bob wyman
>
>