Re: Proposal ideas for Activity Streams 3 Standard

Ditto.

> On Mar 31, 2023, at 3:30 PM, Darius Kazemi <darius.kazemi@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +100000 to avoiding an AS3.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:13 PM Jacky Alcine <yo@jacky.wtf> wrote:
>> Agreed. Maintaining compatibility with existing tools is also important. AP is not the easiest to implement and building a breaking version could be discouraging.
>> 
>> On Fri, 2023-03-31 at 13:54 -0500, a wrote:
>> 
>>> none of this requires or justifies AS3. a far better approach to take is to create conformance profiles or protocol suites based on existing protocols. see https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0459.html for an example of this on the xmpp/xsf side.
>>> 

Received on Saturday, 1 April 2023 01:03:35 UTC