- From: Jacky Alcine <yo@jacky.wtf>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 20:37:28 -0500
- To: public-swicg@w3.org
In this case, I'll say it does. The "Social Web" is a decent enough term (with my non-proven, anecdotal experience on this) that people take it literally - being social on the Web. Thankfully, the term "the Web" is also still sticky enough (my sibling of 21 and his friends tend to either say "it's on the Web" or "google it" so there's not too much of a fight) to work. On Mon, Dec 19, 2022, at 20:32, Johannes Ernst wrote: >> On Dec 19, 2022, at 17:24, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote: >> >>> However, what we're talking about here is the "Social Web" >> >> You could have stopped there! > > Hmm, not bad. > > It might need a bit of explanation, because the term in itself sounds > descriptive, rather than the name of a “thing”. > > Does it meet the daytime TV test? > > Cheers, > > > > Johannes. > > https://reb00ted.org/
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2022 01:38:48 UTC