- From: Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:22:31 +0100
- To: jeff.pollock@oracle.com
- CC: 'Susie M Stephens' <STEPHENS_SUSIE_M@LILLY.COM>, 'Ivan Herman' <ivan@w3.org>, public-sweo-ig@w3.org
Hi Jeff, I wasn't able to follow the business slide work in detail as of my concentrating on coolness of uris, so I may have missed the answer to the followign question: Can I use part of your slides in my presentations? for example the presentation of "Business Applications of Semantic Web" I am going to give in Stavanger Semantic Web days this year? (in a few weeks) license? best Leo It was Jeff Pollock who said at the right time 24.03.2008 15:44 the following words: > Hi Susie & Ivan- > > I have made another iteration with the slides and am attaching a PPT and PDF > format for your review. (attached) > > I apologize in advance if there are any formatting inconsistencies with Open > Office. > > Most of the comments you made below were changed in the PPT, the only one I > didn't think was a good fit was Comment # 2 on Slide 2, I felt that the > other points there were (a) at a higher business abstraction and (b) > supported with other commentary later in the deck. > > I look forward to your suggested next steps! > > Best, -Jeff- > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Susie M Stephens > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 2:42 PM > To: jeff.pollock@oracle.com > Cc: public-sweo-ig@w3.org > Subject: Business Presentation > > > Hi Jeff, > > You've done a great job of putting these slides together. :-) > > I have a few comments that directly relate to individual slides: > Slide 1. SWEO is an 'Interest Group' rather than a 'Working Group'. I'm not > convinced that we need 'Intended for Buyers and Technology Approvers of > Enterprise Software Solutions'. When Ivan converts the material to his > template, we could include the Semantic Web logo on the first slide. > Slide 2. You could add that the Semantic Web also has the capability to > change how you interact with or visualize data. > Slide 3: Maybe the last bullet could be split into 2. That way you'd have a > shorter bullet, and wouldn't need the periods. > Slide 5. The 'to' isn't needed in the title for the slide. Should you also > mention the ability to share data in this slide? > Slide 7. I'm not convinced that 'simplicity' is a 'capability'. Perhaps it > could have its own bullet? I'd prefer it if you are more explicit as to the > sort of 'management' that you mean? > Slide 12 is inconsistent in having a period at the end of one of the > bullets. > > There are a few formatting inconsistencies. E.g. the words in bullets are > capitalized in some slides but not others. Some bullets start with lower > case letters, and others are capitalized. Many of the titles of the slides > are questions, but only some of the titles have question marks. > You reference 'Relational DBs' on slide 3, yet 'RDBMS' on slide 9. > > It seems that the slides finish rather abruptly. Could you add a conclusion > slide? Another option would be to move slide 4 (Your Call to Action) to > just before the citations slide. > > You were asking for suggestions for images. The only one that is springing > to mind is the web of data image that we used in the brochure. You can take > a look at it at: > http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Collateral_Material_%28Semantic_We > b_Flyer%29 > > I would like it if we could somehow bring out the important of the Semantic > Web to data integration a bit more. Could we emphasize or include some of > these points? > - Maximize the value of information > - Information sharing with ultimate flexibility > - Greater level of future-proofing and re-use > - Data isn't trapped within individual applications > > My final thought is that it'd be good if we could make the point that you > can incrementally move to the Semantic Web rather than needing to throw > everything out and starting again. Do you think you could somehow include > that message? > > Thanks for all of your help with this. > > Cheers, > > Susie > > > > > -- ____________________________________________________ DI Leo Sauermann http://www.dfki.de/~sauermann Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz DFKI GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122 P.O. Box 2080 Fon: +49 631 20575-116 D-67663 Kaiserslautern Fax: +49 631 20575-102 Germany Mail: leo.sauermann@dfki.de Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof.Dr.Dr.h.c.mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 ____________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 13:23:18 UTC