- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@semsol.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:33:03 +0200
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
On 29.09.2007 14:48:11, Ivan Herman wrote: >Only partly. My understanding is that the infogathering would accept, >say, a URI for the book collection's RDF version. But it would not have >an info on 'hey, there is another site that also collects, say, book >references' I think the *portal* plans were more focused on the RDF-near stuff, but that the general InfoGathering TF covers both. The majority of collected sources at [1], for example, are in non-RDF formats. However, I may well be wrong and can't speak for the InfoG TF anyway. I just thought your idea could perhaps build on and fit nicely in what they have done so far (e.g. for a speedy start). benji [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/DataSources > >Ivan > > >> benji >> >> >>> Ivan >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> > >-- > >Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2007 13:33:09 UTC