- From: Melliyal Annamalai <melliyal.annamalai@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:31:28 -0400
- To: Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@gmail.com>, public-sweo-ig@w3.org
I am part of the Oracle Database Semantic Technologies group. To introduce the group first, we have developed a database component to store, manage, and query RDF/OWL data stored in the database. The work in the group started 4 years ago, and several papers have been published ([1], [2], [3], [4]). As you can see from [5], the research work led to a product. Other members of the group are part of other W3C groups such as the SPARQL Working Group. Part of my role in the group is interacting with users, understanding use cases and helping them get started on this technology. Given that this is new technology, we have to show users what they gain from this technology, and that is part of my role. These interactions are very interesting and show us what pieces of the technology are considered immediately useful to users, the challenges they face in adopting this technology, and the types of problems they hope to solve using this technology. We see a lot of interest from users, and many novel ways in which people are using the technology. However, there appears to be a need to clearly articulate the benefits of semantic technology for particular applications. A common question we get is: "I can solve this using these other technologies, how exactly is using semantic technologies better?". Looking at this question from the point of view of different kinds of applications provides some very interesting perspectives. After my Ph.D. in Computer Science I have been at Oracle for nearly 10 years, working initially for the multimedia group where I worked on content-based retrieval on images and on image metadata management for Life Science applications. I later began to work on semantic technologies. My background in multimedia and semantics led me to be part of the Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group [6], and now I am looking forward to participating in the SWEO group. As part of my work with customers there are some publications under progress. Melli [1] S. Das, E. I. Chong, G. Eadon, J. Srinivasan. Supporting Ontology-based Semantic Matching in RDBMS. 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto, Canada, 2004. [2] E. I. Chong, S. Das, G. Eadon, J. Srinivasan. An Efficient SQL-based RDF Querying Scheme. 31st International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Trondheim, Norway, 2005. [3] N. Alexander, S. Ravada. RDF Object Type and Reification in the Database. International Conference on Data Engineering, Atlanta, USA, 2006. [4] E. I. Chong, S. Das, G. Eadon, J. Srinivasan. Supporting Keyword Columns with Ontology-based Referential Constraints in DBMS. International Conference on Data Engineering, Atlanta, USA, 2006. [5] http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies/index.html [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/ Susie Stephens wrote: > We've had a few new people join SWEO over the last couple of months. > If you are new, it'd be great if you could send out an introduction to > the mailing list. These introductions are then linked to the Wiki page > [1]. > > Cheers, > > Susie > > [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/Participants
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 03:03:38 UTC