- From: Susie Stephens <susie.stephens@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:23:52 -0400
- To: "Dunja Ewinger" <de@webxcerpt.com>
- Cc: "W3C SWEO IG" <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <fcc499200703141423g71e7674alfb15fbca6a59e758@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Dunja, I think your plans sounds excellent. I look forward to hearing what you think about possibly simplifying the layout for the overview. Lets discuss during next week's call which use cases/case studies/community projects we'd like to include in the conference pack. Ivan will need to respond to your question about money. Cheers, Susie On 3/14/07, Dunja Ewinger <de@webxcerpt.com> wrote: > > > Hi Susie, > > to see what format I was talking about please find attached the Semantic > Web Days Flyer (Flyer_swd.pdf). > > My idea is to create a generell Semantic Web flyer in this format. It > would consist of the (current version of the) SWEO Logo, maybe the W3C > Logo would be good as well, a slogan (that would probably needs to be > discussed...), maybe the layer cake, a nice "eye catcher" (e.g.image), > and generell information on SW (introduction, categories, application > areas, FAQ...) > > I will put together the material and give it to the designer, so she can > start. A very first draft (pdf) will be then sent around by latest > Thursday next week, maybe on time for the telcon on Wednesday. > Within the 3 weeks I'm in holiday the SWEO group should discuss the > flyer in terms of: > > the slogan > the logo > Is the information in the correct order? > What should be the core messages? > Is something missing? > Is the text correct? > etc. > > So by the time I return the designer can continue to work on the flyer > with all the input from SWEO. In this way it should be not a problem to > have the flyer ready for the ESTC. > > I agree with the idea to present use cases or case studies. But of > course one would need to select a few from the current list. How do we > decide which use case we should take? > > One idea that came up during the telcon was to describe the common > projects. It would be good to make a generell decision: shall we present > "solutions" or shall we describe most promising projects but without > solutions yet? > > Another question is how we should present either the use cases or the > projects. In full text or in a table? I found an example for the table > format that could be feasible: > > W3C SWAD > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen_demos_rationale_report/hp-applications-survey.html#Database%20integration%20example > > > I asked the designer to think about possible presentation formats for > the use cases (series of papers, a booklet...). Maybe we can discuss > that during the next telcon. > > Regarding the finances: is there any money in W3C/SWEO that could be > spent on the promotion material? REWERSE could of course pay a part of > the costs but since we are an EU project we have limited financial > resources... An idea could be that REWERSE pays the cost for the design > and W3C for the print. > > What do you think? > > Kind regards, > Dunja > > -- > Dunja Ewinger > Technology Transfer & Awareness > EU-network of Excellence REWERSE > http://rewerse.net > Tel.: +49 89 548 088 48 > Email: de@webXcerpt.com > REWERSE is member of the W3C SWEO Interest Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/ > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2007 21:24:09 UTC