- From: Paul Walsh, Segala <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 11:08:07 -0000
- To: "'Dan Brickley'" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'W3C SW Education and Outreach IG'" <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Yeah but the US doesn't do much about Global warming mate ;-) Talk about digressing :) > -----Original Message----- > From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Dan Brickley > Sent: 05 March 2007 11:05 > To: Paul Walsh, Segala > Cc: 'Ivan Herman'; 'W3C SW Education and Outreach IG' > Subject: Re: On Tim's testimony at the US Senate comm > > > Paul Walsh, Segala wrote: > > Doesn't the title give it away? > > > > "US Congress Telecommuncations and the Internet Subcommittee Hearing on the > > Future of the Web" > > > > How is the future of the Web something which the US Congress can debate? Or > > am I reading too much into this? Are they talking about the future of *the > > Web*, or the future of the Web for *US citizens*? > > > On that logic, they shouldn't have hearings on global warming either. > > Just national warming. It is of course perfectly reasonable for policy > making bodies to try to learn about what's going on around the world. > > > I ask the questions because I'm privy to how ICANN really works as apposed > > to how it's supposed to be non-US and independent. > > This seems somewhat different. Worth giving the video a whirl, ... I > watched most of it live. It's a good thing that they did this I think. > > cheers, > > Dan
Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 11:08:12 UTC