Re: task force information gathering: what do we want?

Leo Sauermann wrote:
> 
> 
> A gentle reminder:
> We can go on forever discussing if DC is better than Bibtex,
> but we start implementing the inofmration crawler on 1 March 2007 and
> the task force should be closed
> by 1st May 2007. So we should have started already implementing and are
> a bit late.
> 

I have to plead partially guilty in the sense that I brought up the
Bibtex issue:-)

I think the important point is to decide which format the contributions
should be in. In this sense the bibtex/doap/etc discussions make a sense
because they are the 'visible' part of the system. But I agree that how
we organize the references to these 'inside' is, in fact, a slightly
secondary issue and we must be as pragmatic as possible...

Ivan


> cheers
> Leo
> [1]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering
> [2]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/DataVocabulary
> [3]http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/InfoGathering/ClassificationOntology
> 
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf