- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 20:05:53 +0200
- To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
My "votes":
1: 0
4: -1
7: +1
9: 0
And the designer's comments I received (ugh ;):
1 and 7 are what you could expect from a branding
agency('s 1st or 2nd iteration). They have
potential, but may need more work. 7 may look
more like a company logo than a technology one,
though. 7 is more "dynamic" than 1.
4 doesn't really comunicate the values. It's
cute, but not professional in the current state.
9 is actually a variation of 7, with a clearer
"S", and a more obvious relation to the Web's
graph structure. The circles make it more
"friendly" than the other shapes.
ben
--
Benjamin Nowack
http://bnode.org/
On 13.06.2007 17:22:38, Benjamin Nowack wrote:
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>During the last weeks and today's telcon, we managed to reduce the
>list of Semantic Web logo proposals to 4 possible drafts [1]. Now
>I'd like to ask the group for feedback: your preferred one(s),
>which one(s) you think we should eliminate, whether we should
>forget them all, etc. (If you think they're all crap and you
>have an idea for the ultimate logo, you can still contact me,
>but please do so asap.)
>
>Please send your comments before the next telcon so that we can
>then decide how to move on.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Benjamin
>
>
>[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Logos
>
>--
>Benjamin Nowack
>http://bnode.org/
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 18:06:08 UTC