Re: Microformats vs RDFa

On 26/01/07, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Danny Ayers wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26/01/07, *Paul Walsh, Segala* <paulwalsh@segala.com
> > <mailto:paulwalsh@segala.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     [PW] couldn't have put it better myself. You'll see from Sam's blog
> >     that it's plastered with Microformats. Why doesn't everyone on this
> >     list vote RDFa <g>
> >
> > Heh, I already did. Though truth be told I'm rather on the fence when it
> > comes to RDFa because of the current ties to XHTML 2.0 (and QNames in
> > attributes are ugly).
>
> Danny,
>
> this is no longer true.


Thanks Ivan. I knew that changes were planned, didn't realise they'd already
taken place.

-- 

http://dannyayers.com