- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:11:20 +0100
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
- Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Hi, here are some comments re wording (no essential ones, really, I think the questions are fine). On 10.01.2007 18:00:50, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: >The W3C Semantic Web Education and Outreach Interest Group wishes to >encourage developers to come together a few practical projects, and *for* a few practical projects? >hopes to gather a community of developers to write code that solves a >current problem. This rally seeks real running code, not vapourware, s/gather/gather and support/ perhaps? Not sure what SWEO's planned contribution to motivation is.. >and it seeks to reach a wide user base. We want to encourage people to >create something that makes a real difference to people now, and >through that, promote the Semantic Web. maybe "promote *a* Semantic Web" (as suggested on the wiki somewhere), or "a more semantic Web", or "the benefits of a|the s|Semantic Web". Just ideas with the basic thought of being as open (tech-wise) as possible (working around bad rap hooks). >So, if you were to decide the project that you think would promote the >Semantic Web the most by getting it into people's lives, what would it >be? hmm, what exactly is the decision about in the end? Will SWEO just suggest a "winner", or what will be the next steps? Is it a two-phase process where people 1st make suggestions and can then vote on the project they'd like to see happen / contribute to? Maybe we should add another sentence here? >2. Rationale: >3. Why do you think this project will have a wide impact? merge those, perhaps? >10. What other technologies could be used to achieve most of the goals >of the project, and why are Semantic Web technologies better suited? Maybe switch the order of these sentence parts or make it sound a bit less "versus"-ish? "What would be the main benefit of using Semantic Web technologies to achieve ..." or so. We could also try to combine q4 with this one, à la "What do SemWeb techs add and where do you see an overlap with other technologies that could be used to accelerate the adoption of your solution?" I hope some of those comments make sense ;) Benjamin >Best, > >Kjetil >-- >Kjetil Kjernsmo >Semantic Web Specialist >Opera Software ASA > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2007 12:12:45 UTC