- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:08:42 +0100
- To: "Paul Walsh, Segala" <paulwalsh@segala.com>
- Cc: 'W3C SWEO IG' <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
On 08.02.2007 18:46:38, Ivan Herman wrote: >Ah! Now I get it. It is a version of your content label ff extension but >for CC. Yes, that sounds like a nice thing to have indeed! Oh, maybe I got that wrong, too, then. You mean that google result lists should have license information embedded per-entry? I.e. you'd do a random search and could see license information (if available)? Yeah, that sounds handy. Could make even more sense for vertical search engines, I guess. >Caveat: at the moment, the CC content is stored in... HTML comment. That >is because putting RDF into HTML and still have it valid was not >possible. *That* is exactly why CC engaged into the RDFa work. But the >current status may make the extension's life a bit tougher... Not sure if I can resist to comment on RDFa and HTML validity ;) benjamin > > >Ivan > >Paul Walsh, Segala wrote: >> Actually, Paul Miller explains it even better than I do in my original post. >> Perhaps you could have a quick read? >> http://segala.com/blog/semantic-labels-for-creative-commons-licences >> >> Many thanks >> Paul >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] >> Sent: 08 February 2007 09:48 >> To: Paul Walsh, Segala >> Cc: 'Susie Stephens'; 'W3C SWEO IG' >> Subject: Re: SWEO is in the news :-) >> >> Paul, >> >> I am not sure what exactly is your question. Is it to give CC license >> for the results of the projects? >> >> There is also a W3C licence for software (which is, afaik, very liberal) >> but I am not sure it is 100% the same as one of the CC licences. I know >> our legal guys are looking at combining these two, and I must admit that >> I do not really know what the subtle differences are. I *really* prefer >> to leave that to my legally minded colleagues... >> >> Ivan >> >> Paul Walsh, Segala wrote: >> >>>Thanks Susie. >>> >>>Reading the article, we could publish a vocabulary for creative commons. >>>Should be really easy. I was talking to David earlier about how to get >>>better adoption. It's kinda like productising a technology as it's easier >> >> to >> >>>sell a product and it is a concept. PEGI for example, has agreed that it >>>will use Content Labels for online games rating. So, rather than wait for >>>them to do something, we'll probably create the labels for them. >>> >>>What do you think about the creative commons license? It is after all, a >>>form of conformance claim. >>> >>>Look forward to your feedback. >>> >>>Thanks >>>Paul >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org] >>>On Behalf Of Susie Stephens >>>Sent: 07 February 2007 15:09 >>>To: 'W3C SWEO IG' >>>Subject: SWEO is in the news :-) >>> >>> >>>There's an article about SWEO in content wire. :-) >>>http://www.content-wire.com/FreshPicks/Index.cfm?ccs=86&cs=4391 >>> >>>Susie >>> >>> >> >> > >-- > >Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html >FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:10:05 UTC