Re: Micromodels.org

Paul beat me with the contentlabel.org plug...

But i'd also add, that whilst the data on micromodels.org is excellent the 
way it is presented is far from ideal. Its hardly surprising, when comparing 
microformats.org and micromodels.org, why one is powering on whilst the 
other is treading water.

Cheers,
-------------
David Rooks
Segala
Senior Standards Compliance Manager and Test Manager

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Walsh, Segala" <paulwalsh@segala.com>
To: "'Kjetil Kjernsmo'" <kjetilk@opera.com>; <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Micromodels.org


>
> Agreed. This is something I brought up on day 1 (perhaps it was day 2 ;))
>
> So, specifically for building a community for Content Labels I've 
> 'started'
> (as you know) contentlabel.org [1]
>
> [1] http://contentlabel.org/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Kjetil Kjernsmo
> Sent: 05 February 2007 14:19
> To: public-sweo-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Micromodels.org
>
>
> All,
>
> I had a long chat with one of our microformats proponents here. He
> pointed out that one of the biggest reasons for the success of
> microformats have been the community around microformats.org.
>
> He suggested that we need something like that for RDF models as well. I
> pointed out that micromodels.org exists (currently pointing to the ESW
> wiki). He feels that the data there is valuable and that we should put
> make an effort to promote it in the micromodels community.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kjetil
> -- 
> Kjetil Kjernsmo
> Semantic Web Specialist
> Opera Software ASA
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.25/669 - Release Date: 
> 04/02/2007
> 21:58
>
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 5 February 2007 16:28:36 UTC