- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:28:05 +0100
- To: Paul Miller <Paul.Miller@talis.com>
- Cc: W3C SWEO IG <public-sweo-ig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <457EBC75.6040104@w3.org>
Paul, In wonder if you know this alternative: http://reader2.com I tried to go in, registered, and added some books. I can look at http://reader2.com/tag/semantic_web and gives me some info, including rating. It does have an RSS feed: http://reader2.com/rss/tag/semantic_web that could be used for mashups if needed. And the output can also be sorted by date. Caveats: - the server seems to be pretty slow - I am not sure who is behind this site, ie, how stable the system will be - the page is pretty much full of ads:-( but it is fully free, no limits on the books that one can use... - a *major* caveat: it does not seem to integrate the tags from different people (that may make the whole thing unusable for us): because I added Tim's book to the list and somebody else has done it, too, in the book is listed twice, instead of once with the rates somehow averaged: http://reader2.com/tag/semantic_web Ivan Ivan Herman wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I began to play with this. I created a user 'ivan_herman' and added four > books to test with. But, somehow, it still smells quite 'beta' to me, > althought it might be a good service indeed. > > For example, I tried to use your [2] click below. All I got is what > seems to be a SQL dump rather than a list of real books. Also, I do not > see my user id appearing among the ones who use this tag (although that > is what I tried to use). I also tried > > http://www.librarything.com/tag/semantic%20web > > which seems to be the same... > > [3] crashes:-( > > It is therefore difficult to see how useful this is (but I will try > again, after all, beta is beta!). > > Another question: is it possible to search the books by the years? I saw > the authors but, in our case, a bunch of books are edited by people, > which is hardly relevant; if I want to find, say, ISWC2003, I would > prefer to go for the year... > > Also: it would be good if the data could somehow be mashed up with other > data, like the RDF data provided by Chris Bizer (see the wiki page on > books). Is there an RSS feed for a page like [1]? That could be a start > > I am happy to continue playing with this for a while, though > > Ivan > > Paul Miller wrote: > >>There was an action on me from last week to take a look at the suitability >>of LibraryThing [1] as one channel by which to push out information about >>Semantic Web books, etc. >> >>Taking a quick look, [2] 16 people currently tag 18 books [3] as being in >>some way related to the topic. >> >>In each case, you can view descriptions of the book, find various ways to >>get hold of it by buying or borrowing it, or look at related and recommended >>works. >> >>Given the number of people claiming to own any one of these titles, the >>really valuable network effects are not kicking in fully. However, if 'the >>community' were encouraged to embrace this as a way of increasing awareness >>and understanding then it could certainly serve as one useful tool amongst >>many in our toolkit. >> >>Give it a try for yourself, maybe recording a couple of titles that *you* >>own; registration is free, and you can catalogue up to 200 books for free as >>well. >> >>See something like [4] or [5] for examples of the possibilities once the >>crowd gets wise... >> >>See also [6] for one way in which a colleague of mine has been able to >>further enhance the display... >> >>[1] - http://www.librarything.com/ >>[2] - http://www.librarything.com/tag/semantic+web >>[3] - http://www.librarything.com/tag_allbooks.php?tag=semantic%20web >>[4] - http://www.librarything.com/work/16738 >>[5] - http://www.librarything.com/work/11754 >>[6] - http://www.talis.com/tdn/greasemonkey/librarythingthing >> > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 14:27:56 UTC