- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:47:41 +0100
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@googlemail.com>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 17 May 2009, at 18:08, Thomas Baker wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:36:27PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> I would have however been slightly more comfortable with the HTML >> document(ation) giving the explanations that are currently in >> Appendix C. >> Especially, I liked the idea of being able to access the RDF >> (withouth >> conneg) quite quickly from the HTML. >> If linking directly to the RDF in the HTML document is judged not >> to be >> elegant, I think that at least the link to the SKOS Reference in >> this HTML >> document should point directly to Appendix C, and appendix C be >> added with >> a link to the RDF/XML file (without conneg). >> Would that be ok? I don't think the latter solution implies a big >> change... > > To be clear, I think Appendix C should provide direct links to > the HTML expression, RDF schema, and DL prune, and I think Sean was > agreeing when he wrote [1]: > >> Tom writes: >>> -- In Appendix C, links to the documents needed to be added in C.1, >>> C.2, and C.3. In C.2, a clickable link could also be >>> added to the words "by citing its URI". >> >> Ok. Yes I was. > I also agree with linking from the HTML document directly to > Appendix C. > > In addition, you suggest that the SKOS namespace document HTML > variant [2] also point directly to the RDF/XML file without > conneg [3], and I also agree with that -- maybe with a sentence > like: "See also the SKOS Namespace Document RDF/XML Variant". Again, I'm fine with this. Sean -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 08:48:30 UTC