- From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:59:44 +0100
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@googlemail.com>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
I think I've now addressed these comments. There are still some fiddly editorial bits to do (aligning TOC etc). Also, some of the actual URLs for the various namespace variants in Appendix C need to be tied up. Sean On 17 May 2009, at 18:08, Thomas Baker wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:36:27PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> I would have however been slightly more comfortable with the HTML >> document(ation) giving the explanations that are currently in >> Appendix C. >> Especially, I liked the idea of being able to access the RDF >> (withouth >> conneg) quite quickly from the HTML. >> If linking directly to the RDF in the HTML document is judged not >> to be >> elegant, I think that at least the link to the SKOS Reference in >> this HTML >> document should point directly to Appendix C, and appendix C be >> added with >> a link to the RDF/XML file (without conneg). >> Would that be ok? I don't think the latter solution implies a big >> change... > > To be clear, I think Appendix C should provide direct links to > the HTML expression, RDF schema, and DL prune, and I think Sean was > agreeing when he wrote [1]: > >> Tom writes: >>> -- In Appendix C, links to the documents needed to be added in C.1, >>> C.2, and C.3. In C.2, a clickable link could also be >>> added to the words "by citing its URI". >> >> Ok. > > I also agree with linking from the HTML document directly to > Appendix C. > > In addition, you suggest that the SKOS namespace document HTML > variant [2] also point directly to the RDF/XML file without > conneg [3], and I also agree with that -- maybe with a sentence > like: "See also the SKOS Namespace Document RDF/XML Variant". > > Tom > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/ > 0055.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/skos.html > [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/skos.rdf > >> >> About the branding of (SKOS+/-)XL: currently the Primer includes >> some XL >> and SKOS+XL, in accordance with the previous version of the >> Reference. But >> I'll be happy to change that to SKOS-XL! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Antoine > > -- > Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> > -- Sean Bechhofer School of Computer Science University of Manchester sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 17:00:35 UTC