W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: [SKOS] "SKOS RDF schema"

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:59:44 +0100
Message-Id: <AE020BA7-D9CB-400D-B2FA-36B9C752A42B@manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Alistair Miles <alimanfoo@googlemail.com>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>

I think I've now addressed these comments. There are still some  
fiddly editorial bits to do (aligning TOC etc). Also, some of the  
actual URLs for the various namespace variants in Appendix C need to  
be tied up.


On 17 May 2009, at 18:08, Thomas Baker wrote:

> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 04:36:27PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>> I would have however been slightly more comfortable with the HTML
>> document(ation) giving the explanations that are currently in  
>> Appendix C.
>> Especially, I liked the idea of being able to access the RDF  
>> (withouth
>> conneg) quite quickly from the HTML.
>> If linking directly to the RDF in the HTML document is judged not  
>> to be
>> elegant, I think that at least the link to the SKOS Reference in  
>> this HTML
>> document should point directly to Appendix C, and appendix C be  
>> added with
>> a link to the RDF/XML file (without conneg).
>> Would that be ok? I don't think the latter solution implies a big  
>> change...
> To be clear, I think Appendix C should provide direct links to
> the HTML expression, RDF schema, and DL prune, and I think Sean was
> agreeing when he wrote [1]:
>> Tom writes:
>>> -- In Appendix C, links to the documents needed to be added in C.1,
>>>   C.2, and C.3.  In C.2, a clickable link could also be
>>>   added to the words "by citing its URI".
>> Ok.
> I also agree with linking from the HTML document directly to
> Appendix C.
> In addition, you suggest that the SKOS namespace document HTML
> variant [2] also point directly to the RDF/XML file without
> conneg [3], and I also agree with that -- maybe with a sentence
> like: "See also the SKOS Namespace Document RDF/XML Variant".
> Tom
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/ 
> 0055.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/skos.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/skos.rdf
>> About the branding of (SKOS+/-)XL: currently the Primer includes  
>> some XL
>> and SKOS+XL, in accordance with the previous version of the  
>> Reference. But
>> I'll be happy to change that to SKOS-XL!
>> Cheers,
>> Antoine
> -- 
> Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>

Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 17:00:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:56 UTC