- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 07:49:27 +0100
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Ed,
This is a non-issue. Once there was one, but this has been resolved [1].
Either one is talking about HTML elements (which is likely a rare case) such
as the case with RDForms [2], in which it is perfectly ok and encouraged to
use @id values in @about, or one talks about things that are not part of the
HTML document (people, books or whatever) which yields simple patterns
avoiding conflicts. Take the following excerpt from the SCOVO specification
[3], for example, being a simple RDF schema defined in RDFa:
<div id="c-Item" about="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#Item" typeof="rdfs:Class">
<h3 property="rdfs:label">Item</h3>
...
</div>
<div id="p-dimension" about="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#dimension"
typeof="rdf:Property">
<h3>dimension</h3>
An <a rel="rdfs:domain" href="#c-Item"
resource="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#Item">Item</a> <span
property="rdfs:label">has a dimension</span> <a rel="rdfs:range"
href="#c-Dimension"
resource="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#Dimension">Dimension</a>.
</div>
No magic involved. Just a careful selection of @href, @id and @resource. To
say it with a good old friend of mine: YES WE CAN! ;)
Please, let us not threaten people using RDFa if there is no reason for it.
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa_vs_RDFXML
[2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/PushBackDataToLegacySourcesRDForms
[3] http://purl.org/NET/scovo
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/
> From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:54:01 -0400
> To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
> Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: SKOS Implementation : LCSH
> Resent-From: <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 03:54:42 +0000
>
> Yes, I argued for removing the RDFa to avoid having to answer this
> question ... and also the problem of keeping the html in sync with the
> rdf/xml, n-triples and turtle views.
>
> //Ed
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>> On 30/4/09 23:18, Ed Summers wrote:
>>>
>>> (hopefully it's not too late to sneak this in ... the service just
>>> went live today)
>>
>> Really great to see this back online!
>>
>> A question about URIs, RDFa, conneg, http-range-14 etc:
>>
>> (sorry!)
>>
>> """ <div id="conceptDetailTab"
>> about="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh98002696#concept"
>> typeof="skos:Concept">
>> <h1 property="skos:prefLabel" xml:lang="en">Bristol Bridge
>> Massacre, Bristol, England, 1793</h1>
>>
>> <span rel="skos:inScheme"
>> resource="http://id.loc.gov/authorities#conceptScheme"/>
>> <div id="concept">
>> <br/>
>>
>> <b>URI:</b>
>>
>> <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh98002696#concept>
>> <br /><br />
>> """
>>
>> If http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh98002696#concept is the URI of the skos
>> Concept, aren't we supposed to avoid using it in the HTML markup when an
>> XHTML/RDFa representation is made available? ie I remember from a previous
>> thread that (against many intuitions) id="concept" should be avoided.
>> Otherwise we get into that boring thread about whether it is a URI for a
>> piece of HTML or for the thing the HTML describes / represents...
>>
>> Sorry to nitpic, but I guess this is why W3C does implementation surveys...
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> * Vocabulary Title
>>>
>>> Library of Congress Subject Headings
>>>
>>> * Name of Organization Responsible for Implementation
>>>
>>> The Library of Congress, USA
>>>
>>> * SKOS Constructs used
>>>
>>> skos:Concept
>>> skos:ConceptScheme
>>> skos:prefLabel
>>> skos:altLabel
>>> skos:example
>>> skos:editorialNote
>>> skos:scopeNote
>>> skos:changeNote
>>> skos:historyNote
>>> skos:definition
>>> skos:broader
>>> skos:narrower
>>> skos:related
>>> skos:closeMatch
>>> skos:inScheme
>>>
>>> * URLs
>>>
>>> http://id.loc.gov/authorities
>>> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/download/xml
>>> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/download/ntriples
>>>
>>> * Other Details:
>>>
>>> LCSH has been actively maintained since 1898 to catalog materials
>>> held at the Library of Congress. By virtue of cooperative cataloging
>>> other libraries around the United States also use LCSH to provide
>>> subject access to their collections. In addition LCSH is used
>>> internationally, often in translation.
>>>
>>> 2,600,937 triples
>>> 309,408 concepts
>>> 72,376 skos:closeMatch links to RAMEAU SKOS Vocabulary
>>> 13 concept schemes
>>>
>>> * Contacts
>>> Clay Redding<cred@loc.gov>
>>> Ed Summers<edsu@loc.gov>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 06:50:10 UTC