- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 07:49:27 +0100
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Ed, This is a non-issue. Once there was one, but this has been resolved [1]. Either one is talking about HTML elements (which is likely a rare case) such as the case with RDForms [2], in which it is perfectly ok and encouraged to use @id values in @about, or one talks about things that are not part of the HTML document (people, books or whatever) which yields simple patterns avoiding conflicts. Take the following excerpt from the SCOVO specification [3], for example, being a simple RDF schema defined in RDFa: <div id="c-Item" about="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#Item" typeof="rdfs:Class"> <h3 property="rdfs:label">Item</h3> ... </div> <div id="p-dimension" about="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#dimension" typeof="rdf:Property"> <h3>dimension</h3> An <a rel="rdfs:domain" href="#c-Item" resource="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#Item">Item</a> <span property="rdfs:label">has a dimension</span> <a rel="rdfs:range" href="#c-Dimension" resource="http://purl.org/NET/scovo#Dimension">Dimension</a>. </div> No magic involved. Just a careful selection of @href, @id and @resource. To say it with a good old friend of mine: YES WE CAN! ;) Please, let us not threaten people using RDFa if there is no reason for it. Cheers, Michael [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa_vs_RDFXML [2] http://esw.w3.org/topic/PushBackDataToLegacySourcesRDForms [3] http://purl.org/NET/scovo -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:54:01 -0400 > To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> > Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org> > Subject: Re: SKOS Implementation : LCSH > Resent-From: <public-swd-wg@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 03:54:42 +0000 > > Yes, I argued for removing the RDFa to avoid having to answer this > question ... and also the problem of keeping the html in sync with the > rdf/xml, n-triples and turtle views. > > //Ed > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: >> On 30/4/09 23:18, Ed Summers wrote: >>> >>> (hopefully it's not too late to sneak this in ... the service just >>> went live today) >> >> Really great to see this back online! >> >> A question about URIs, RDFa, conneg, http-range-14 etc: >> >> (sorry!) >> >> """ <div id="conceptDetailTab" >> about="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh98002696#concept" >> typeof="skos:Concept"> >> <h1 property="skos:prefLabel" xml:lang="en">Bristol Bridge >> Massacre, Bristol, England, 1793</h1> >> >> <span rel="skos:inScheme" >> resource="http://id.loc.gov/authorities#conceptScheme"/> >> <div id="concept"> >> <br/> >> >> <b>URI:</b> >> >> <http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh98002696#concept> >> <br /><br /> >> """ >> >> If http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh98002696#concept is the URI of the skos >> Concept, aren't we supposed to avoid using it in the HTML markup when an >> XHTML/RDFa representation is made available? ie I remember from a previous >> thread that (against many intuitions) id="concept" should be avoided. >> Otherwise we get into that boring thread about whether it is a URI for a >> piece of HTML or for the thing the HTML describes / represents... >> >> Sorry to nitpic, but I guess this is why W3C does implementation surveys... >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> >>> * Vocabulary Title >>> >>> Library of Congress Subject Headings >>> >>> * Name of Organization Responsible for Implementation >>> >>> The Library of Congress, USA >>> >>> * SKOS Constructs used >>> >>> skos:Concept >>> skos:ConceptScheme >>> skos:prefLabel >>> skos:altLabel >>> skos:example >>> skos:editorialNote >>> skos:scopeNote >>> skos:changeNote >>> skos:historyNote >>> skos:definition >>> skos:broader >>> skos:narrower >>> skos:related >>> skos:closeMatch >>> skos:inScheme >>> >>> * URLs >>> >>> http://id.loc.gov/authorities >>> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/download/xml >>> http://id.loc.gov/authorities/download/ntriples >>> >>> * Other Details: >>> >>> LCSH has been actively maintained since 1898 to catalog materials >>> held at the Library of Congress. By virtue of cooperative cataloging >>> other libraries around the United States also use LCSH to provide >>> subject access to their collections. In addition LCSH is used >>> internationally, often in translation. >>> >>> 2,600,937 triples >>> 309,408 concepts >>> 72,376 skos:closeMatch links to RAMEAU SKOS Vocabulary >>> 13 concept schemes >>> >>> * Contacts >>> Clay Redding<cred@loc.gov> >>> Ed Summers<edsu@loc.gov> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 06:50:10 UTC