W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: SKOS Implementation : LCSH

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 06:05:42 +0200
Message-ID: <49FA7516.9040809@danbri.org>
To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 1/5/09 05:54, Ed Summers wrote:
> Yes, I argued for removing the RDFa to avoid having to answer this
> question ... and also the problem of keeping the html in sync with the
> rdf/xml, n-triples and turtle views.

Seems to me this is something the SWD WG ought to have a position on, 
since it has two key deliverables: SKOS (a language for talking about 
representations of topics and their inter-relationships) and RDFa (a 
language to allow XHTML documents to describe their topic in 
machine-friendly form). If we can't always deploy the two together, we 
need a pretty compelling explanation about why, when etc the two are 
compatible. If both are to be W3C recommendations, it seems natural to 
use them together.

Last time I raised this, the consensus seemed to be:

* if a SKOS concept URI with a #foo is de-referencable to XHTML without 
redirection, then id="foo" should never be used in the HTML, although 
about= is ok.
* the same URI could de-ref to RDF/XML
* not sure what to say about redirections, or #-free URIs for concepts


Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 04:06:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:56 UTC