- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:00:10 +0200
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- CC: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4A24415A.5090002@cs.vu.nl>
Ralph, Thanks, I will update the request and send it out. Wrt Diego's comment about the mailing list, I'm quite sure that is a cut-andpaste error. I will correct it. Guus Ralph R. Swick wrote: > At 03:13 PM 6/1/2009 +0200, Guus Schreiber wrote: >> All, >> >> Here is the draft PR request for SKOS. > > Looks good, Guus. A few comments. > > Needs to cite (e.g. by reference) the Abstract and Status of this Document > sections. Proposed SOTD: > > This document is a W3C Proposed Recommendation published by the > Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, part of the W3C Semantic Web > Activity. This document reflects editorial changes arising during > the Candidate Recommendation review, summarized in the Changes > section. An implementation report documents known uses of SKOS > during the Candidate Recommendation review period. An updated > SKOS Primer Working Draft is being published concurrently with this > Proposed Recommendation. > > Comments on this document may be addressed to > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org. Please include the text "SKOS > comment" in the subject line. All comments sent to that address > are available in a public archive. > > >> Guus >> >> >> >> Director, >> >> The Semantic Web Deployment Working Group requests transition to Proposed Recommendation for >> >> SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-skos-reference-20090317/ >> >> The updated editor's draft can be found at: >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/ (Revision 1.13) >> >> The record of the WG decision to requests this transition is at: >> >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2009/05/19-swd-minutes.html#item03 >> >> No substantive issues were raised during CR, though a few comments >> resulted in editorial clarifications to the specification. Changes from the >> Candidate Recommendation version are given in the "Changes" >> section of editors draft: >> >> [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/#changes > > It would be good to cite the messages (or logged issues) that led > to these changes (e.g. issues 192, 218, and 219). Strictly speaking > we could be asked for another Disposition of Comments report but > given the nature of these comments and the fact that the changes > are noted in the Changes section if we cite the messages and > issues in our transition request that ought to suffice. The mention > of the issues serves as a response to the "Evidence that the document > has received wide review" portion of the transition request. > > >> There were no features at risk. >> >> The requirements have not changed since Candidate Recommendation. >> >> This specification has no normative references to W3C specifications >> that are not yet Proposed Recommendations. >> >> The Groups' implementation report [5] notes 27 implementations with >> a broad coverage of SKOS features. All comments have received formal >> responses; these are recorded in the issue tracker [6]. The specification >> has therefore met the CR exit criteria. >> >> [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html >> [6] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues >> >> There have been no formal objections. >> >> There have been no changes to the patent disclosure pages since the >> transition to Candidate Recommendation. There are no open exclusion >> opportunities. > > For the benefit of others reading our request, it would be good to > note that the Working Group intends to publish an updated > SKOS Primer Working Draft at the same time as this Proposed > Recommendation. (In case they don't read the proposed SOTD above :) > >> Thomas Baker >> Guus Schreiber >> co-chairs Semantic Web Deployment WG > >
Received on Monday, 1 June 2009 21:00:42 UTC