- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:25:35 +0100
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
On 29/1/09 22:21, Guus Schreiber wrote: > As an afterthought: > > Perhaps we should include a fourth point about the fact that RDF/XML is > not any more the only normative exchange syntax. This may very well > hamper interoperability between the SKOS/RDF and OWL2 world. On this point, I tried briefly to understand how the rdf:text proposal would look in RDFa ... ... I don't think it'd be pretty (unless @content is used extensively). Literals would contain extra materials not intended for human consumption. Not 100% sure on that, but if I understand rdf:text right, ... Dan
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2009 21:26:11 UTC