- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 11:41:01 -0500
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
The record of today's (brief) Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
telecon [1] is ready. Thanks to Antoine for scribing this meeting.
http://www.w3.org/2009/01/20-swd-minutes.html
A text snapshot follows.
----
SWD WG
20 Jan 2009
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0051.html
See also: [3]IRC log, previous [4]2009-01-13
[3] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/20-swd-irc
[4] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html
Attendees
Present
Tom Baker, Ralph Swick, Antoine Isaac, Diego Berrueta, Sean
Bechhofer
Regrets
Daniel Rubin, Margherita Sini, Ed Summers
Chair
Tom
Scribe
Antoine
Contents
* Topics
1. ADMIN
2. RDFA
3. RECIPES
4. RDFa METADATA NOTE
5. AOB
6. SKOS
* Summary of Action Items
_____________________________________________________
Tom: this is the 96th teleconf!
ADMIN
RESOLVED to accept minutes of last teleconference
[13]2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html
[13] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/13-swd-minutes.html
RDFA
ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition to Group
Note [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
[CONTINUES]
[14] http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02
RECIPES
ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15]
[CONTINUES]
[15] http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15
ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes
implementations] [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [CONTINUES]
RDFa METADATA NOTE
ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of the
metadata note [recorded in
[16]http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03]
[CONTINUES]
[16] http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03
AOB
ACTION: Guus to look at OWL documents for review [recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-swd-minutes.html#action10]
[CONTINUES]
[17] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-swd-minutes.html#action10
SKOS
ACTION: Guus to report on usage of SKOS in vocabularies at VU for
SKOS implementation report [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action09]
[CONTINUES]
[18] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action09
ACTION: Sean to report on SKOSED for SKOS implementation report
[recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action10]
[CONTINUES]
[19] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action10
Tom: transition request?
Ralph: it's in progress
... we made the request, and are waiting for the answer
Tom: will the answer come in the form of an announcement that the
docs have been published?
Ralph: yes
Tom: I wanted to have a discussion on mapping relationships
... but Alistair is not here
Ralph: would somebody be ready to start an implementation template?
Tom: Guus said that someone of his group was working on that
Sean: I looked at previous impl. rep. ...
... when we don't have tests it's not easy to write
Tom: it could start next week
... I suggest we adjourn today
Tom:next meeting next week (27 Feb)
Antoine: I had a question from a colleague about use of rdfs:label
... we don't say anything in Reference about skos:note or
rdfs:comment
... did we consider making all the notes subproperty of rdfs:comment
?
Sean: no, but I don't think it would break anything
... skos:note is an AnnotationProperty now
... so we could easily add the subProperty relationship from
skos:note to rdfs:comment
Antoine: if we wanted to consider this, would it be a big change?
Ralph: I advise against the WG adding that unilaterally. Would be
better if CR implementors or users initiated a discussion on a
mailing list suggesting "it would be nice if ..."
Sean: we could record this as a placeholder for future consideration
... feels like a useful issue to log as 'postpone'
Tom: I wonder whether it is appropriate to raise issue after CR
request
... theoretically issues can come up from the community
... there's no formal rule barring us to raise one
... any other issues?
... meeting is adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[PENDING] ACTION: Ben review RDFa Use Cases and propose transition
to Group Note [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: Guus to look at OWL documents for review [recorded
in [21]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-swd-minutes.html#action10]
[PENDING] ACTION: Guus to report on usage of SKOS in vocabularies at
VU for SKOS implementation report [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action09]
[PENDING] ACTION: Ralph post his comments on the editor's draft of
the metadata note [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03]
[PENDING] ACTION: Ralph to review the revised Recipes draft
[recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15]
[PENDING] ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of
Recipes implementations] [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20]
[PENDING] ACTION: Sean to report on SKOSED for SKOS implementation
report [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action10]
[20] http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-swd-minutes.html#action02
[21] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-swd-minutes.html#action10
[22] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action09
[23] http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html#action03
[24] http://www.w3.org/2008/12/02-swd-minutes.html#action15
[25] http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20
[26] http://www.w3.org/2009/01/06-swd-minutes.html#action10
[End of minutes]
_____________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [27]scribe.perl version 1.133
([28]CVS log)
$Date: 2009/01/20 16:35:44 $
[27] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[28] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 20 January 2009 16:41:31 UTC