- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:12:10 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi folks I've just written up a suggestion I made in yesterday's SWCG call: http://danbri.org/words/2009/01/10/386 SKOS deployment stats from Sindice Excerpted below, or see post for hyperlinks to the Sindice searches. Hoping this might be useful, Dan [[ I suggested drawing a distinction between the use of SKOS to publish thesauri (ie. SKOS schemes), and the use of SKOS in RDFS/OWL schemas, for example subclassing of skos:Concept or defining properties whose range or domain are skos:Concept. A full treatment would look for a variety of constructs (eg. new properties that declare themselves subPropertyOf something in SKOS). An example of such a use of SKOS is the new sioc:Category class, recently added to the SIOC namespace. Here are some quick experiments with Sindice. Search results for advanced “* <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#domain> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept>”, found 10 Search results for advanced “* <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#range> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept>”, found 10 Search results for advanced “* <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#subClassOf> <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept>”, found 18 Here’s a query that finds all mentions of skos:Concept in an object role within an RDF statement: Search results for advanced “* * <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept>”, found about 432.32 thousand This all seems quite healthy, although I’ve not clicked through to explore many of these results yet. BTW I also tried using the proposed (but retracted - see CR request notes) new SKOS namespace, http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#Concept (unless I’m mistaken). I couldn’t find any data in Sindice yet that was using this namespace. ]]
Received on Saturday, 10 January 2009 16:12:50 UTC