- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:30:04 +0100
- To: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- CC: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:19:43PM +0000, Alistair Miles wrote: >> Instead of: >> >> """They have as their ranges [RDF-CONCEPTS] RDF plain literals, which >> means that they link a skos:Concept to a character string, not to >> another full-fledged RDF resource identified with a URI.""" >> >> I suggest: >> >> """They are used to link a skos:Concept to an RDF plain literal, which >> is a character string (e.g. "love") combined with a language tag >> (e.g. "en-US").""" >> >> Avoiding any difficult wording. > > Yes, that neatly side-steps the issue. Maybe "optional language tag"? OK with me... Antoine
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2009 18:30:45 UTC